EPFL
 Biomedical Imaging GroupSTI
EPFL
  Publications
English only   BIG > Publications > Oropharyngeal Glycolysis


 CONTENTS
 Home Page
 News & Events
 Members
 Publications
 Tutorials and Reviews
 Research
 Demos
 Download Algorithms

 DOWNLOAD
 PDF
 Postscript
 All BibTeX References

Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy—Which Threshold Is the Best Predictor of Local Control?

J. Castelli, A. Depeursinge, B. De Bari, A. Devillers, R. de Crevoisier, J. Bourhis, J.O. Prior

Clinical Nuclear Medicine, in press.

Please do not bookmark the "In Press" papers as content and presentation may differ from the published version.


Purpose: In the context of oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, the aim of this retrospective study was to identify the best threshold value to compute metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and/or total lesion glycolysis to predict local-regional control (LRC) and disease-free survival.

Methods: One hundred twenty patients with a locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer from 2 different institutions treated with definitive radiotherapy underwent FDG PET/CT before treatment. Various MTVs and total lesion glycolysis were defined based on 2 segmentation methods: (i) an absolute threshold of SUV (0–20 g∕mL) or (ii) a relative threshold for SUVmax (0%–100%). The parameters' predictive capabilities for disease-free survival and LRC were assessed using the Harrell C-index and Cox regression model.

Results: Relative thresholds between 40% and 68% and absolute threshold between 5.5 and 7 had a similar predictive value for LRC (C-index = 0.65 and 0.64, respectively). Metabolic tumor volume had a higher predictive value than gross tumor volume (C-index = 0.61) and SUVmax (C-index = 0.54). Metabolic tumor volume computed with a relative threshold of 51% of SUVmax was the best predictor of disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.23 [per 10 mL], P = 0.009) and LRC (hazard ratio: 1.22 [per 10 mL], P = 0.02).

Conclusions: The use of different thresholds within a reasonable range (between 5.5 and 7 for an absolute threshold and between 40% and 68% for a relative threshold) seems to have no major impact on the predictive value of MTV. This parameter may be used to identify patient with a high risk of recurrence and who may benefit from treatment intensification.

© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from Wolters Kluwer Health.
This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.